The Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Throughout this century, international pressure for a world in peace and harmony and transform the global political balance after the end of the Cold War, led to a large extent, the momentous conclusion of multilateral agreements, many of whom were sponsored by the UN. With these initiatives, by the mid-nineties, the entire southern hemisphere would become a major nuclear-weapon-free zone, thus reducing the risk of nuclear proliferation in the world.

These regional treaties oblige, equally, to non-nuclear-weapon to submit to inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the process of nuclear fuel processing, so as to ensure proper compliance with them.

Faced with this reality, must we conclude that it is futile to try to combat the spread of WMD through a collective, rule-based system of international security — and that we have to acquiesce to living in a world plagued with the constant threat of a nuclear holocaust or other disasters? I do not believe so. But reliance on a system of collective security to curb the proliferation of WMD will require bold thinking, a willingness to work together, and sustained effort. The following steps, among others, are in my view urgently required.

In conclusion, thinking that all these weapons of mass destruction should be illegal because of the damage that produces, not only in humans, in which they could be murder, also it could deform the human; also every living thing, and actually every thing that surrounds whenever these weapons are used. A the problem is that the countries that had these arms are the most powerful in the world so because of their interest they are not going to accept in dropping or eliminate its production of weapons.